So what did this “proof” consist of?
If was a YouTube clip by a well-known Islamic apologist called Dr. Zakir Naik. If you are familiar with him, then this is the point at which you face-palm, because this guy is a complete …(insert your favourite expletive here). “Ah ha” you might respond, “an Ad hominem”. Actually no, you can pick almost any derogatory term you like and it would still be a factual statement, the evidence for that is contained within the YouTube clip itself.
OK, so looking at the clip, what claims and “evidence” do we find, lets take a look …
I’m betting that you don’t get further than the first four minutes, because of the degree of crass stupidity.
First Claim.
He starts out with a claim that most atheists are first generation atheists, but cites no statistics, it is simply his opinion. The basis for this is the observation that most religious people are religious because they inherited their beliefs from their parents. That is indeed probably correct. He then suggests that atheists don’t believe because they have been thinking about it all.
So he is telling his rather large Muslim audience that those who have given belief a bit of thought come to the no-god conclusion, and those that don’t stay religious.
Well yes, this “Apologetics” thing is not going all that well for him so far, I’m really buying into this idea of thinking critically.
Next Claim: The reason why atheists are atheists
He then moves on to claim that atheists are atheists because they “believe” in science and technology … wrong.
The are two rather glaring flaws here
- People do not “believe” in science and technology, it is evidence-based, not “belief” based.
- The reason people reject god claims has nothing to do with science and technology, but rather because generally those making god claims are unable to present anything at all to verify that their claim is true.
When you point this out, as I did, I was offered “atoms” which I cannot see with my eye, or “wind” which I also cannot see with my eye, yet I accept them to be real. Sadly of course if you take a bit of time (two seconds perhaps) you can work out that atoms and wind, unlike Allah, can in fact be measured and detected.
You will then be assured that there are “100 million proofs”, so you say, “Well that’s good, so just pick the very best, the strongest example and present it”, and yet strangely enough, nothing ever comes to light.
His Next step: It’s a first cause argument
He starts out with the “Suppose a new machine is given to you, you know nothing about it, so how do you find out about it? You ask the manufacturer”. And so he soon quickly expands that to the entire universe. In essence …
- Everything has a maker, no exceptions
- So who made the universe? … why obviously my 7th century Allah concept did it
I’m sure you can see the flaws here …
- Why pick Allah, in fact you can pick any god you like, both known and unknown to humans. The argument is just as valid for desists as it is for theists.
- The fatal flaw is that if you do indeed have a rule that says “everything has a cause”, no exceptions, then all you have done is to add an additional layer of pointless complexity for no reason and with no evidence. Even further. If indeed everything has a cause, and god is the ultimate cause, then what caused god
The usual get-out clause is to claim that god has no cause, and the reason for that, or evidence of that, un-caused claim is ….. (insert sound of tumble weed here).
This is of course palaeolithic thinking at best, when faced with something mysterious, just invert a god as the cause, and while it might indeed be an answer, it is not the right answer. In all of human history the “god did it” claim has been proven false every time for all previous claims – lightening, weather, etc… This instance will be just the same.
This insanity is not evidence, nor is it proof, it is simply making up stuff.
The Big Bang
He makes reference to the big bang being the origin of the universe and asserts that atheists claim that it is the cause of the universe. Wrong, the Big Bang simply describes the early expansion of the universe from a singularity. If he is going to attempt to talk science, he should at least gain a basic understanding.
It then leads to the usual nonsense – “Look, here is a vague poetical verse I plucked out of the Quran. This describes the big bang, it’s a miracle, God must have told the author“. It is usually a vague poetical verse into which you can crowbar almost anything at all. So which do you think is the right answer here ?
You don’t need to think too hard about that one (I hope).
The Moon Reflects sunlight, it’s a miracle
He continues on the theme of modern science in the Quran, and strives to be even sillier. He next claims humans only discovered that the moon reflected sunlight 100-200 years ago. Er no, that has been known for thousands of years prior to the existence of the Quran. The Greek philosopher Thales wrote about the moon reflecting the sun in 585 BC.
This claim leaves you two choices here …
- Naik is lying
- Naik is an idiot
Your choice, but either way I don’t think I really care, because once you get to this point then any further analysis is utterly pointless. You already have enough to seriously question the integrity and credibility of Mr Naik.
What follows is more of the same, for example he claims the Quran describes the earth of spherical, but it does not, it actually describes the world as flat, or the claim that the Quran describes an expanding universe or … well you get the idea. It might indeed fool some, but do some analyse for any of these claims and it rapidly falls apart.
What About Naik, is he just a harmless crank?
He is in fact not just a nut, he is also a very dangerous violent individual. Not only does he promote silly claims, he also promotes intolerance, violence, and murder.
- He promotes the idea that ex-muslims who criticise islam should be murdered
- He supports terrorism and openly endorsed Osama Bin laden – for this reason he has been banned from entering the UK and Canada
He merits attention, not because he promotes daft claims (most beliefs do that), but because he promotes ideas that if embraced cause real harm, and for that reason he deserves the spotlight. His ideas should be ridiculed and mocked, and he should also be revealed as the violent thug that he really is.
Interesting take on this fu*khead. Couple of things though that I found where you may be overstepping or lacking direct knowledge while criticizing this vermin. On you first point where Naik claims that the reason why atheists are atheists is because they “believe” in science and tech. I don’t think that is your valid point as to why he is wrong. Why? Because English is NOT his native language and I am sure when he spoke he was using the thought process in his OWN language while speaking English and thus for to you and I this is an incorrect expression, but to him it seems appropriate due to language differences. Cut him some slack on that one. The second error you have is in the section about the Moon reflecting the Sun – you are stating that the Quran claims the earth is flat, but like Naik you are not offering proof of your claim except the mention of Quran. Can you be more specific in which Verse or Chapter you found this? Because the Quran has 114 Chapter which consist of 6,236 Verses… Please more details. I am a Muslim and NEVER have I read the specifics of saying the Earth is flat…
Regarding the flat earth, here is a link to an article I wrote ion that topic and covers the precise details. You might find it of interest. http://104.154.120.89/religion/quran-state-earth-flat/
Please Create a webpage or facebook page debunking Zakir naik cause I’ve seen that he has many followers in facebook. Please save this world!!!
This does not debunk zakir naik. I’m not saying he is right. actually I’m on your side he is the stupid, liar and con man. well here is my evidence http://www.unchangingword.com/naik_refuted.php .
also there was a debate between this moron and a christian William campbell in which he seems to have won. but when you examine his arguments and the evidence he provided you can’t stop laughing. Ali sina wrote about this debate in “World’s Greatest Showman”(go to his website Faithfreedom).
Zakir Naik lies by saying: there are more female than male(to support polygyny;); Islam is the only religion to believe in Mohhamod and Jesus;Islam is the fastest growing religion in America;and if you eat pig you act like a pig(to explain why pork is bad) etc…. [which are all false go to wikipedia and find for your self]
Generally Zakir naik is the reason why i consider Islam inferior to any other major religion.
Actually is Zakir Naik, despite being a medical doctor, has a fifth century mindset and is a terrible hater of other religion. to sum not exaggeratedly, he is simply the biggest arsehole
zakir naik aka zakar naik (zakar is penis in malay language, naik is up). you are just full of shit. Rambling on abaout islam without making any sense at all. You yourself can’t prove the existence of of your allah aka “mouse”. All your videos are just nonsense and you look like a unkept retarded idiot and yet still rambling nonsense on Christianity. We laugh at you and those who defended you must check into a mental rehab. Buz off like a fly and land on some shit will you. small zakar naik
gaman logiut the one who is speaking against Dr Zakir Naik has no logical point to defend & hence uses abusive language because he has lost senses the fact is you cannot prove the existence of God,if the videos are not worthy then why the majority of christains are accepting it you laugh today there will be a time when you will cry by now you might know who needs a mental check you buzz off like a stinking insect.
It is not ad hominem if what is being said is a true representation of the point that is being said by the Erect Penis.. His arguments and point shows that he is a misleading person, guilty of cherry-picking and misrepresentation.. His argument can’t stand criticism and therefore is invalid
gaman loguit doesnt have to speak out against Zakir Naik, Zakir Nair himself does it. As does the article which examines his claims and shows them to be false with facts, not beliefs. As for God, it is not up to atheists to prove the existence of God, it’s up to Muslims, Christians and other theists to support and prove the existence of their God. Atheists are critical thinkers who base their reasoning, their logic and everything else on fact(s) and evidence. Every atheist can prove their argument(s) through evidence in science, technology and other areas, and don’t expect others to do so. If you want evidence of God, then you and Zakir Nair and others who believe, must prove it.
I also refuse to address him as a Doctor, because quite frankly his accreditation from India would never be recognized in any Western country, nor would he be able to practice as any sort of Doctor in the west. His degree quite frankly is reflected in his lack of knowledge, lack of facts and his utter stupidity and ramblings on things he knows nothing about, but claims to. It is this sort of arrogance and misguidedness that is the problem with this world in this day and age. Worse still, people believe him and every bit of lies, ignorance and falsehoods he spreads. If even half of the people who bother to listen to him try googling it, they’d realize he’s a liar and an idiot. How can anyone learn if they follow people like him with blind faith? It only spreads and breeds further ignorance. There are many Muslims out there with far more knowledge in matters of religion, the world and science. Look to them, not to him. Perhaps it is you who needs a mental check, or a proper education where you can learn the truth for yourself.
And gaman loguit didn’t say Christians accepted his videos, but rather, Zakir Naik’s ramblings about Christianity were wrong. Incorrect. False. Big difference. Seriously, check out everything he says with facts. Or are you afraid to accept that he is wrong? Use your brain.